Abstract

The fraud case was carried out by First Travel officials Andika Surachman and Anniesa Deavitasari Hasibuan who succeeded in defrauding 63.310 prospective Hajj pilgrims with a total loss of Rp. 905.330.000.000,- who been sentenced to 20 years and 18 years in prison respectively where criminal liability has been imposed on the defendants but civil liability still cannot be borne out even though the panel of judges in the trial for postponing debt payment obligation has agreed to a settlement with peace proposal which contains the debtor's obligation to dispatch the Hajj pilgrims and return money for those who do not wish to depart because first travel's assets no longer exists and first travel is no longer operating

Abstract

A settlement offer in the process of suspension of debt payment obligation is in principle given to convince creditors that the debtor has the desire to settle their debts. When the debtor is in an unstable condition and feels unable to pay his debts, the law provides the debtor with the opportunity for the debt payment obligation to be suspended and provide a settlement offer for their creditors, which is regulated in Article 222 paragraph (2) of the Law No. 37 of 2004. However, in practice, it turns out some debtors do not use this opportunity to provide a settlement offer, in which case the Law No. 37 of 2004 does not explicitly regulate the legal consequences. This is the focus of this research by reviewing and discussing several jurisprudence/judge decisions with different legal considerations to see what the legal consequences are if the Debtor does not submit a settlement offer.

Abstract

Personal data is one of the most crucial aspects in Indonesia, which has been following the digital development. Unlike Singapore and Japan, which already have institutions overseeing the protection of personal data, Indonesia does not have one yet and is still aspiring to establish an independent supervisory authority that can assist the public in personal data protection. This research employs a normative juridical study with a legal approach and a conceptual approach. The result of this research is the need for harmonization between Law Number 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection and Law Number 11 of 2008, as amended by Law No. 19 of 2016 on Electronic Information and Transactions, with the regulations of Singapore's Personal Data Protection Act and Japan's Act on the Protection of Personal Information as a comparative model to establish an independent institution regulating personal data in Indonesia.

Abstract

The crime of human trafficking is a form of modern human slavery. Apart from that, the criminal act of human trafficking is one of the worst forms of treatment that violates human dignity. Apart from investigating and arresting perpetrators, Immigration can also block the movement of perpetrators, prevent perpetrators from entering and exiting the country, and carry out deportation if necessary. Mahfud MD said that the human trafficking network syndicate in Batam was not an ordinary network because it was well coordinated. Mahfud assessed that the indications of alleged drownings must be investigated further. Moreover, the number of cases is not small in various parts of the world. There are various modes. Prevention is carried out by Immigration to prevent the crime of trafficking in persons by increasing monitoring at the border, tightening the provision of passports, especially to people who are still of productive age, to prevent them from becoming victims of the crime of trafficking in persons abroad, which means that the immigration authorities are regarding this crime of trafficking in persons. must increase supervision so that it can prevent the occurrence of criminal acts of human trafficking, so that the crime rate of criminal acts of human trafficking is reduced.                       

Abstract

This study investigated the problem of COVID-19 vaccination program refusal. To solve this problem, it is necessary to develop regulations governing sanctions for the COVID-19 vaccination program refusal and include the sanctions on informed consent documents. An informed consent document can be the basis for health workers to give a person a COVID-19 vaccine and can be concrete evidence that a person refuses to be vaccinated. This is very important considering that the COVID-19 vaccination program is expected to be able to accelerate COVID-19 handling and prevention by achieving herd immunity. In this study, the researchers applied a socio-legal research method. This study investigated several things. The first is the problem of the COVID-19 vaccination program refusal. The second is a legal perspective on the COVID-19 vaccination program refusal. The third is a recommended regulation model to deal with the problem of COVID-19 vaccination program refusal.

Abstract

Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang merupakan kejahatan luar biasa yang merugikan keuangan negara dan kesejahteraan rakyat. Bahkan kedua jenis tindak pidana khusus tersebut telah menjadi isu dan sorotan di dunia internasional. Indonesia berdasarkan Corruption Perception Index Tahun 2022, saat ini berada pada nomor 34 dengan peringkat 110 dari 180 negara di dunia. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwaKonsep mengenai perampasan aset sudah banyak diakui dan diterima di dunia internasional, bahkan melibatkan kerjasama internasional untuk mewujudkannya. Dengan diratifikasinya United Nation Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) Tahun 2003 melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2006, sudah seharusnya perampasan aset sebagai salah satu strategi untuk mengembalikan kerugian negara yang terjadi sebagai akibat tindak pidana korupsi dan tindak pidana pencucian uang. Oleh karenanya perlu segera diundangkan undang-undang tentang perampasan aset di Indonesia.

Abstract

Arbitrase diperkenalkan dalam organisasi World Trade Organization pada Pasal 25 dari Dispute Settlement Understanding, sebagai salah satu jalan penyelesaian sengketa yang bisa ditempuh para pihak. Penelitian ini membahas mengenai bagaimana arbitrase dalam Dispute Settlement Understanding dapat dipergunakan untuk menyelesaikan proses sengketa perdagangan internasional di tahap banding, dan bagaimana implikasi dan tantangan dalam berjalannya arbitrase sebagai alternatif penyelesaian sengketa perdagangan internasional di tahap banding.  Metode penelitian yang dipergunakan adalah non doktrinal, dengan mengolah dan menganalisis bahan hukum seperti perjanjian internasional, putusan dari lembaga penyelesaian sengketa internasional dan peraturan perundang-undangan terkait. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Pasal 25 DSU pada dasarnya menekankan adanya objek sengketa dari arbitrase yang ditafsirkan secara luas, yakni sengketa yang dapat didefinisikan oleh para pihak, sehingga forum arbitrase dimungkinkan untuk dipergunakan sebagai mekanisme banding. Secara sosiologis, urgensi adanya arbitrase di tahap banding adalah karena adanya pemblokiran penambahan anggota di AB, yang menyebabkan AB tidak dapat memproses perkara yang masuk dari para pihak. Arbitrase ini memberikan suatu terobosan hukum baru dan perjanjian turunan berupa terbentuknya Multi Party Interim Appeal Arbitration, namun memiliki tantangannya tersendiri, seperti permasalahan validitas dari lembaga arbitrase sendiri dan dimungkinkannya putusan arbitrase ditolak eksekusinya oleh hukum nasional.

Kata Kunci: Arbitrase; Banding; Sengketa Perdagangan Internasional; WTO.

Arbitration is introduced in the World Trade Organization in Article 25 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding, as one of the dispute resolution avenues that parties can pursue. This research discusses how arbitration in the Dispute Settlement Understanding can be used to resolve international trade dispute processes at the appeal stage, and what are the implications and challenges in the operation of arbitration as an alternative to international trade dispute resolution at the appeal stage.  The research method used is non-doctrinal, by processing and analyzing legal materials such as international agreements, decisions from international dispute settlement institutions and related laws and regulations. The results of this study show that Article 25 of the DSU basically emphasizes the existence of an object of dispute from arbitration which is interpreted broadly, namely disputes that can be defined by the parties, so that the arbitration forum is possible to be used as an appeal mechanism. Sociologically, the urgency of arbitration at the appeal stage is due to the blocking of additional members in the AB, which causes the AB to be unable to process incoming cases from the parties. This arbitration provides a new legal breakthrough and a derivative agreement in the form of the establishment of Multi Party Interim Appeal Arbitration, but has its own challenges, such as the issue of the validity of the arbitration institution itself and the possibility of arbitral awards being denied execution by national law.

Keywords: Arbitration; Appeal; International Trade Dispute; WTO.

Abstract

Pencucian uang (money laundering) merupakan kejahatan serius yang memiliki dampak negatif pada stabilitas keuangan dan integritas sistem hukum. Dalam praktik kenotariatan, penting untuk menerapkan prinsip Anti-Money Laundering (AML) guna mencegah praktik pencucian uang dan memastikan integritas transaksi yang melibatkan notaris. Penelitian ini membahas dasar hukum penerapan prinsip AML dalam praktik kenotariatan dan menganalisis implementasinya. Pada prinsipnya ketentuan mengenai kewajiban seorang Notaris melaporkan Pengguna Jasa seharusnya diatur dalam suatu Undang-Undang, hal ini agar sesuai dengan penerapan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris dan prinsip kerahasiaan jabatan Notaris. Melalui pemahaman yang baik tentang dasar hukum dan langkah-langkah yang tepat, praktik kenotariatan dapat berkontribusi dalam mencegah dan mengatasi kejahatan pencucian uang.

Abstract

This research aims to determine and analyze the substance of the regulation of communal intellectual property rights in Indonesia and to determine and analyze the role of Regional Government in providing legal protection for communal intellectual property rights in North Sulawesi. The method used in this research is a normative legal research method which uses a statutory approach to examine the regulation of communal intellectual property rights and an empirical method to determine the role of Regional Government in providing protection for Communal Intellectual Property Rights in North Sulawesi. Data analysis uses the content analysis method for primary and secondary legal materials, while data obtained through interviews uses qualitative data analysis. The results of the research show that the regulation of Communal Intellectual Property includes several regulations, namely Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2013 concerning Ratification of the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Haring of Benefits Arising from Their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Law- Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright, Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications. The role of the regional government of North Sulawesi Province and Regency/City in providing protection for Communal IPR by carrying out registration which includes Traditional Cultural Expressions and Traditional Knowledge, while Indications of Origin and Geographical Indications as well as Genetic Resources have not yet been registered. This research concludes the Legal Regulation of Communal Intellectual Property It has not been regulated in a specific regulation but is still spread across several laws and regulations, while the role of Regional Government shows that not all are actively paying attention to protecting Communal IPR, which is measured by the number of Communal IPR registered and those currently in the registration process.

Abstract

This research was carried out with the aim of knowing and analyzing the legal regulations for foreign investment employing foreign workers in Indonesia and the application of the law regarding the use of foreign workers in North Sulawesi. The method used in this research is a normative legal research method which uses a statutory approach to study the legal regulation of foreign workers and an empirical method to determine the application of foreign labor laws.

The research results show that the regulation of foreign workers in Indonesia is contained in Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Employment and its derivative regulations and is also contained in the Job Creation Law as regulated in Law No. 6 of 2023. In the Employment Law, provisions for foreign workers are contained in Article 42 to 45. Several provisions regulate that every employer who employs foreign workers is required to have written permission from the Minister or appointed official. Foreign workers can be employed in Indonesia only in an employment relationship for certain positions and certain times. The implementation of the law regarding the use of foreign workers in North Sulawesi is carried out by several agencies, namely those at the center, in this case the Ministry of Manpower, as well as agencies in the regions, namely the Manpower Service and the Immigration Office..

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian kali ini guna mengetahui tanggung jawab hukum rumah sakit dalam pelayanan kesehatan. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif dan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif bersifat library research (kajian kepustakaan). Sumber data yang digunakan yaitu bahan hukum primer dari Undang-undang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Undang-undang terkait rumah sakit merupakan sarana pengawasan agar pelayanan kesehatan dari rumah sakit dapat tercapai. Bentuk tanggungjawab rumah sakit ketika menyebabkan kerugian pada pasien terdapat pada Undang-undang Republik Indonesia tentang Rumah Sakit Pasal 46 yaitu pertama rumah sakit bertanggungjawab penuh kelalaian yang diakibatkan oleh pihak rumah sakit, kedua ketika tidak ada kelalaian yang diakibatkan pihak rumah sakit maka tidak akan ada pertanggungjawabannya, ketiga rumah sakit tidak bertanggungjawab terhadap kelalaian yang dilakukan di rumah sakit.

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII-2020 states that Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation is conditionally unconstitutional. This is the basis for the government to take action by establishing Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 to replace Law Number 11 of 2020. However, the action taken by the government has drawn a lot of criticism from the public because the government is considered not careful and too hasty in taking action by establishing government regulations in lieu of the law. Consider whether the government takes appropriate action by looking comprehensively at the presence or absence of force crunch which is the basis for the establishment of government regulations in lieu of law in accordance with Article 22 Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution.

Abstract

Children of terrorism cannot be considered as perpetrators of crimes, but victims of crime, victims of terrorism networks, victims of doctrine, exploitation of thoughts, propaganda from parents or adults around them so they must be protected specifically. Children like this should not be imprisoned, but must be educated, given counseling, rehabilitated and social assistance. Judging from the Law on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, the imposition of death penalty and life imprisonment does not apply to perpetrators of criminal acts of terrorism who are under 18 years of age or who are still classified as children. The state is also obliged to provide special protection for children who commit acts of terrorism. As for the legal arrangements for child perpetrators of terrorism from the perspective of human rights in Indonesia, it is regulated in several national regulations.

Keywords: child of terrorism, human rights

Abstract

The term negligence is part of professional incompetence, from a health perspective, the term negligence is called malpractice, meaning bad practice, giving rise to claims that go to court.  Whereas, medical risks are unexpected events, such as surgery or other medical procedures, which contain medical risks which can actually become an obstacle to medical practice. Society finds it difficult to differentiate between malpractice and medical risk, so it is important to share this knowledge with legal officials and society, so that it does not become a polemic throughout the ages.

Abstract