Keywords:

legality, morality, publicity, categorical imperative, obligation-based legal theory
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2620-9837
Publish Date
17/12/2024
Languages
English
access type Open Access

TEORI HUKUM BERBASIS KEWAJIBAN MENURUT IMMAUEL KANT

Authors

Page range: 577-608

Abstract

Law that is philosophically discussed by Immanuel Kant is related to morality, especially to individual autonomy. While law emphasizes the necessity of action according to external norms, morality actually orders humans to act according to their inner convictions. In this regard, Kant distinguishes between legality and morality. Legality is the mere conformity of an action to external law or norms, without considering the inner elements, while morality is the conformity of an action to the inner norm, namely the awareness of responsibility and obligation in a concrete situation. According to Kant, law is an instrument to promote moral values. If morality is essentially determined by the individual's capacity to determine themselves through their personal actions, then the effectiveness of law occurs on the contrary thanks to the power of institutions or authoritative bodies. However, the validity of the objectivity of both can only be accepted if both morality and law are open to intersubjective discourse. In Kant's philosophy, the understanding that uses this discursive imperative is publicity or publicity. Publicity is an essential element in the process of making law. In his book The Metaphysical Basis of Morality (Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, 1785 abbreviated: GMS) Kant stated that an action is only moral if it is done for the sake of duty alone, not for other considerations. And to form such a moral command Kant mentioned several conditions or principles, for example the principle known as the 'general principle of law': "always act based on the maxim that you can at the same time will as general law" and "all actions related to the rights of others, whose maxims are not in line with publicity, are wrong." Kant's intention with the general principle of law is to find out whether an action taken must be carried out and whether my maxim can be universalized (made a general law for everyone). If "yes", the action must be carried out. If "no" the action is not mandatory. That is why Kant's ethics and legal theory are categorized as duty ethics (deontology) and duty-based legal theory.

References

Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Theory of Freedom, Cambridge University Press, 1990.

Abbot, Thomas Kingsmill. Kant’s Critique of Practiscal Reason and Other Works on the Theory of Ethics (6th ed, 1909).

Bertrand, Russel. A History of Philosophy (and its connection with political and social circumstances, etc), London : George Allen and Undwim, Ltd., 1957.

Dore, Isaak. The Epistemological Foundations of Law, Carolina Academic Press, Durham, North Carolina, 2007.

Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Right Seriously. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1977.

Dworkin, Ronald. Justice for Hedgehogs, Cambridge and London: The Belknap Press of The Harvard University Press, 2011.

Hildebrand, von Hildebrand. Moralty and Situation Ethics, 1966.

Huijbers, Theo. Filsafat Hukum Dalam Lintasan Sejarah, Yogyakarta, Kanisius 1982.

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason terjemahan Lewis White Black, New Yor: Macmillan Publising company, 1986.

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason, terjemahan Kemp Smith edisi kedua, 1965.

Kant, Immanuel. Grounding for the The Metaphysics of Moral, terjemahan oleh James Ellington, Indianapolis, Cambridge 1993.

Kant, Immanuel. The Metaphysics of Morals, terjemahan Mary Gregor, Cambridge, 1996.

Kant, Immanuel. Theory and Practice : Concerning the Common saying: This May Be True in Theory But Does Not Apply to Practice, in the Philosophy of Kant (Carl. S. Friedrich ed., 1949).

Kersting, Wolfgang. “11 Politics, Freedom, and Order: Kant’s Poltical Philosophy,” in Paul Guyer (ed) The Cambridge Companion to Kant, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992, hal 3-342, 1992

Scheler, Max, Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wartethik, 1913.

Schneewind, J.B. Outonomy, Obligation, and Virtue: An Overview of Kant’s Moral Philosophy, in Cambridge Companion to Kant (paul Guyer ed., 1992).

Sullivan, J. An Introduction to Kant’s Ethics, Cambridge University Press, 1994.

SP, Simon L. Tahjadi. Hukum Moral, Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1997.

Waldron, Jeremy. The Dignity of Legislation, Cambridge University Press, 1999.

How to Cite

Petrus CKL Bello. (2024). TEORI HUKUM BERBASIS KEWAJIBAN MENURUT IMMAUEL KANT. Jurnal Hukum to-Ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur Dan Melindungi Masyarakat, 10(3), 577–608. https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v10i3.401