Keywords:

Anti-trust Regulation, Risk, Potential, Sharing Platform
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2620-9837
Publish Date
17/12/2024
Languages
English
access type Open Access

ANALISA RISIKO DAN POTENSI REGULASI ANTI-TRUST UNTUK SHARING PLATFORM AIRBNB

Authors

Page range: 544-561

Abstract

The Airbnb sharing platform represents a digital accommodation business model that provides affordable lodging alternatives to users worldwide. The existence of the Airbnb platform can increase income for property owners and boost the economy. However, in Indonesia, there is currently no clear anti-trust regulation governing the Airbnb sharing platform, which poses risks that could threaten conventional businesses. This study aims to analyze the risks and potential for anti-trust regulation in Indonesia concerning the Airbnb sharing platform. Utilizing a normative legal research methodology, this study employs both legislative and conceptual approaches, relying on secondary data obtained through library research, with qualitative data analysis to examine relevant Indonesian anti-trust regulations for the Airbnb sharing platform. The findings indicate that anti-trust regulations could effectively govern the Airbnb sharing platform, minimizing risks and ensuring healthy digital competition while fostering strong innovation in digital accommodation services, ultimately creating a competitive digital business landscape.

References

Airbnb, I. (n.d.). Peraturan dan standar. Retrieved April 1, 2024, from https://www.airbnb.co.id/help/topic/1437

Akbar, R., & Andrawina, L. (2019). Intention determination of sharing economy business provider in the theory of planned behavior model using partial least square (study case: Airbnb Indonesia). 2018 International Conference on Industrial Enterprise and System Engineering (ICoIESE 2018), 382–386. https://doi.org/10.2991/icoiese-18.2019.67

Akman, P. (2019). Online platforms, agency, and competition law: mind the gap. Fordham Int’l LJ, 43, 209. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/frdint43&div=11&id=&page=

Astuti, N. K., & Dewantara, R. (2024). Regulasi Persaingan Usaha Dalam Mencegah Praktik Tidak Sehat Pada Securities Crowdfunding. Honeste Vivere, 34(1), 100–119. https://www.ejournal.fhuki.id/index.php/hv/article/view/307

Chua, E. L., Chiu, J. L., & Bool, N. C. (2019). Sharing economy: An analysis of Airbnb business model and the factors that influence consumer adoption. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 8, 19. https://buscompress.com/uploads/3/4/9/8/34980536/riber_8-s2_03_h18-019_19-37.pdf

Dananjaya, I. K., Undari, N. K. A. S., & Halmadiningrat, I. M. (2023). Reformulasi Hubungan Kerja bagi Driver Online: Analisis Kekosongan Hukum untuk Mengkonstruksi Pekerjaan yang Layak. JURNAL YUSTIKA: MEDIA HUKUM DAN KEADILAN, 26(01), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.24123/yustika.v26i01.6140

Di Amato, A. (2016). Uber and the sharing economy. Italian LJ, 2, 177. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/italj2&div=14&id=&page=

Disemadi, H. S. (2022). Lenses of Legal Research: A Descriptive Essay on Legal Research Methodologies. Journal of Judicial Review, 24(2), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v24i2.7280

Ducci, F., & Tremblay-Huet, S. (2018). Competition law and policy issues in the sharing economy. Law and the “Sharing Economy”: Regulating Online Market Platforms, 295–318. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv5vdczv.13

Effendi, A. M. (2024). PERAN HUKUM ANTI TRUST DALAM MENGATUR DAN MENGADILI PRAKTIK MONOPOLI DAN PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT. Multilingual: Journal of Universal Studies, 4(2), 186–195. https://ejournal.penerbitjurnal.com/index.php/multilingual/article/view/828

Effendi, B. (2020). Pengawasan Dan Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Bisnis Digital (E-Commerce) Oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Dalam Praktek Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 4(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v4i1.16228

Febrina, R. (2022). Persaingan Usaha pada Era Digital Menurut Persepektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Multidisiplin (JURKIM), 2(1), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.31849/jurkim.v2i1.9309

Felländer, A., Ingram, C., & Teigland, R. (2015). Sharing economy. Embracing Change with Caution. Näringspolitiskt Forum Rapport, 11.

Fitra, S. (2013). Law Enforcement by the Commission for the Supervisory of Business Competition in Evidence of Article 17: Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 Year 1999 Concerning Prohibition Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. Available at SSRN 2226770. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2226770

Galih Kusumah & Destinasi, I. (n.d.). Fenomena Bisnis Akomodasi AirBnb dan Dampaknya pada Pariwisata di Indonesia. Magister Pariwisata Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. https://mpar.upi.edu/fenomena-bisnis-akomodasi-airbnb-dan-dampaknya-pada-pariwisata-di-indonesia/#:~:text=Bisnis akomodasi AirBnb adalah salah,membutuhkan tempat menginap secara online.

Halidi, A. R. (2023). Praktek Monopoli Pelaku Usaha Di Era Digital Pada Produk Internet (Studi Kasus Perusahaan Google Di Indonesia). JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah, 8(3), 2242–2257. https://doi.org/10.24815/jimps.v8i3.25685

Hartono, J., Rosyadi, J., & Nugraha, X. (2021). Analisis Penggunaan Algoritma Harga Sebagai Bentuk Perjanjian Penetapan Harga Di Indonesia. Jhbbc, 37–49. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v4i1.4499

Hidayat, W., Ardiansyah, M., & Setyanto, A. (2021). Pengaruh Algoritma ADASYN dan SMOTE terhadap Performa Support Vector Machine pada Ketidakseimbangan Dataset Airbnb. Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika, 5(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.29408/edumatic.v5i1.3125

Hovenkamp, H. J. (2021). Antitrust and Platform Monopoly. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3639142

Indonesia, P. P. (1999). Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/45280/uu-no-5-tahun-1999

Julyano, M., & Sulistyawan, A. Y. (2019). Pemahaman terhadap asas kepastian hukum melalui konstruksi penalaran positivisme hukum. Crepido, 1(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.13-22

Kim, B., & Kim, D. (2020). Attracted to or locked in? Explaining consumer loyalty toward Airbnb. Sustainability, 12(7), 2814. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072814

Kurniasari, T. W. K., & Rahman, A. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pelaku Usaha Umkm Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan Platform Digital: Marketplace Melalui Penetapan Harga Dan Penguasaan Pasar. REUSAM: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.29103/reusam.v10i2.9577

Maulana, A., Rosyidi, M. I., Koesfardani, C. F. P. P., Hidayah, S. A., & Amory, I. D. G. R. A. (2021). Potensi dampak Airbnb terhadap usaha penyediaan akomodasi di Provinsi DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 29(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.14203/JEP.29.1.2021.59-80

Ridwan, R., & Anugrah, M. R. (2021). Implementasi Konsep Sharing Economy Berbasis ICT pada Sektor Pariwisata. Prosiding Diseminasi Hasil Penelitian. https://lp3m.janabadra.ac.id/admin/assets/images/data_files_penelitian/0002_sharingeconomy_ridwan.pdf

Riyadi, S., & Durianto, D. (2021). The Impacts of the 1890 US Antitrust Policy and the Current Indonesia Competition Law. 2nd International Conference on Business Law and Local Wisdom in Tourism (ICBLT 2021), 475–478. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icblt-21/125965334

Sabirin, A., & Herfian, R. H. (2021). Dampak Ekosistem Digital terhadap Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia serta Optimalisasi Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) di Era Ekonomi Digital. Jurnal Persaingan Usaha, 1(2), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.55869/kppu.v2i.23

Setyawati, R., & Pradana, R. A. (2022). Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan Oleh Pelaku Usaha Dominan Melalui Penggunaan Algoritma Harga. UIR Law Review, 6(2), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.25299/uirlrev.2022.vol6(2).11750

How to Cite

Angterina, David Tan, & Lu Sudirman. (2024). ANALISA RISIKO DAN POTENSI REGULASI ANTI-TRUST UNTUK SHARING PLATFORM AIRBNB. Jurnal Hukum to-Ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur Dan Melindungi Masyarakat, 10(3), 544–561. https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v10i3.396