Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): Agustus
- Journal Details
-
- Format
- Journal
- eISSN
- 2620-9837
- Publish Date
- 31/08/2021
- Languages
- English
Open Access
NOVELTY PRINCIPLE: PARADOKS PROTEKSI HAK DESAIN INDUSTRI DI INDONESIA
Authors
Abstract
Phrase "significantly equal" isn’t regulated in Law 31 of 2000 about Industrial Design, it’s cause in multiple interpretations related to the meaning of "novelty". The novelty element should refer to TRIPs Agreement, which isn’t the same or not similar to the previous disclosure. This study uses a normative juridical method, with a theoretical approach that is relevant to industrial design protection. This is what underlies research to determine the effectiveness of industrial design rights protection based on the novelty principle, and how to formulate law of industrial design in the future.
Keywords: Industrial Design Rights, Novelty, Protection by Law
References
Achidah et al (2016). Pengaruh promosi, harga dan desain terhadap keputusan pembelian sepeda motor Mio GT. Journal of Management.Ahmad Baihakki Z,2013.
Analisa Pengaruh Citra Merek, Kualitas Produk, dan Promosi Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian. (Studi Kasus Pasta Gigi Pepsodent Di Wilayah Jakarta Timur): Skripsi. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.Alma. 2011.
Manajemen Pemasaran dan Pemasaran Jasa. Bandung : Penerbit Alfabeta.Agustin (2016).
Analisis kualitas produk, harga dan promosi terhadap keputusan pembelian motor Honda Vario (studi kasus pada TRIDJAYA MOTOR delear resmi motor Honda cabang GIRIAN-BITUNG).